Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VakO 11.3.1982/3581:81 AI generated

Insurance court denied widow's pension claim after remarriage, citing statutory bar on new marriage for benefit eligibility.

Case Number VakO 11.3.1982/3581:81
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court dismissed the widow's claim for a family pension following her remarriage. The applicant had previously received a family pension under the Traffic Insurance Act but failed to receive the TEL family pension due to a settlement, leading to a dispute over her new eligibility. The court ruled that remarriage automatically disqualified her from receiving the pension, as the statutory conditions for continuation were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Traffic Insurance Act; Family Pension Act: Remarriage of a widow constitutes a permanent bar to the continuation of a family pension, regardless of prior settlement issues or lack of direct payment.

Keywords

AI generated
family pension remarriage disqualification Traffic Insurance Act widow benefits insurance court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Traffic Insurance Act
Family Pension Act
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Leski oli saanut liikennevakuutuslain mukaista perheeläkettä eikä hänelle yhteensovituksesta johtuen ollut maksettu TEL:n perhe-eläkettä. Leski solmi uuden avioliiton. Koska hänelle ei ollut suoritettu TEL:n perhe-eläkettä, hänellä ei ollut oikeutta myöskään kertasuoritukseen Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. VII -jaosto ETK 20/66