Family pension claim dismissed when applicant's fiancé also qualified for family pension benefits.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Insurance Court dismissed the applicant's request to revoke the family pension decision because the fiancé also met the eligibility criteria. The applicant argued that the pension should be granted solely to them, while the pension fund contended that the fiancé's separate right to benefits invalidated the applicant's claim. The court ruled that since the fiancé qualified independently, the applicant could not be the sole recipient of the family pension.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedFamily pension Act; Insurance Court Act: A family pension is not granted to an applicant if their fiancé independently qualifies for the same benefit, as the statutory conditions for the pension are not exclusive to the applicant.
Keywords
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
KKO oli vahvistanut, että edunjättäjällä oli kihlalapsi. Eläkelaitos pyysi poistamaan perhe-eläkepäätöksensä, koska kihlalapsella oli myös oikeus perheeläkkeeseen. VAKO suostui purkuhakemukseen. I -jaosto