Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 13.1.1982/2401:82 AI generated

Insurance court dismisses claim that a 62-year-old judge was overworked due to handling major corruption cases.

Case Number VakO 13.1.1982/2401:82
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court dismissed the claim that a 62-year-old High Court judge was subjected to excessive workload. The judge, who had served as a division chair for seven years, was handling extensive oral trials involving major corruption cases. The court found no evidence that these duties constituted a legally recognized overwork situation requiring relief.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Vakuutusoikeus 10.1.1982/2401:82; The court holds that handling extensive oral corruption trials does not automatically constitute overwork for a senior judge.

Keywords

AI generated
insurance court jurisdiction judicial overwork assessment corruption case workload senior judge capacity excessive burden standard
AI generated
insurance_1983_3889-1982
Insurance court dismissed claim for work-related disability pension due to lack of sufficient medical evidence.
insurance_1983_3917-1982
Insurance court dismisses claim for work-related disability benefits for a 60-year-old with pre-existing heart conditions.
insurance_1983_4129-1982
Insurance court dismissed disability claim for driving instructor due to pre-existing back pain and job stress.
insurance_1983_3325-1982
Insurance court dismissed claim for work-related disability pension due to insufficient medical evidence of permanent impairment.
insurance_1982_3551-1982
Insurance court dismissed claim that diabetic employee with health issues was overworked.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

62vuotiaan hovioikeudenneuvoksen, joka oli toiminut viimeksi 7 vuoden ajan hovioikeuden jaoston puheenjohtajana ja joutunut käsittelemään suullisesti käsiteltyjä laajoja virkarikosja maanpetosasioita, katsottiin olleen rasittavassa työssä. VI -jaosto