Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 25.10.1982/1367:82 AI generated

Insurance court dismissed claim for damages due to delay exceeding 15-year statute of limitations.

Case Number VakO 25.10.1982/1367:82
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The insurance court dismissed the claim for damages caused by the inaction of non-enforcement proceedings. The plaintiff argued that the delay should be treated as a special reason allowing a claim beyond the standard fifteen-year limitation period. The court ruled that such procedural delays do not constitute a special reason to extend the statutory limitation period.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Laki 23.12.1981 VII-jaosto: The court held that delays caused by the non-enforcement of judgments do not constitute a special reason permitting a claim to be filed after the expiration of the fifteen-year limitation period.

Keywords

AI generated
insurance court jurisdiction statute of limitations non-enforcement proceedings delay damages claim special reason exception

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Laki 23.12.1981 VII-jaosto

Cited Case Law

AI generated
VAKO 2091:82
Vahingonkorvauksen tuloksettomien ulosottotoimenpiteiden aiheuttamaa viivästymistä ei ollut pidettävä sellaisena erityisenä syynä, jonka perusteella korvausta voitaisiin hakea myöhemmin kuin rivl 15 §:ssä säädetyn määräajan kuluessa.(Laki 23.12.1981) VII-jaosto Vertaa VAKO 2091:82
AI generated
insurance_1983_2088-1982
Insurance court dismissed claim where insured failed to prove loss occurred within statutory limitation period.
kko-precedent_1989_33
Supreme Court dismisses late extension request for termination dispute because application was filed after the two-week deadline expired.
kko-other_2016_2355
Supreme Court dismisses claim for damages from illegal competition restrictions due to statute of limitations expiration.
kko-precedent_1990_59
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where late submission of documents after a statutory deadline causes the complaint to lapse.
kko-other_2016_2353
Supreme Court dismisses claim for damages from illegal competition restrictions due to statute of limitations expiry.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Vahingonkorvauksen tuloksettomien ulosottotoimenpiteiden aiheuttamaa viivästymistä ei ollut pidettävä sellaisena erityisenä syynä, jonka perusteella korvausta voitaisiin hakea myöhemmin kuin rivl 15 §:ssä säädetyn määräajan kuluessa.(Laki 23.12.1981) VII-jaosto Vertaa VAKO 2091:82