Insurance court dismissed claim that multi-year TV show contracts constitute a single continuous employment relationship.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Insurance Court dismissed the applicant's claim that a series of separate contracts for TV show design and hosting over several years formed one continuous employment relationship. The applicant argued the work was continuous and within the same organizational unit, while the opposing party maintained the contracts were distinct legal entities. The court ruled that the absence of a single continuous contract prevented the formation of one employment relationship, upholding the original decision.
Legislator headnote
AI generateds. 10 of the Act on the Insurance Court; s. 1 of the Act on the Establishment of the Insurance Court: A series of separate employment contracts for work performed over multiple years does not constitute a single continuous employment relationship unless the contracts are explicitly linked as one.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Televisio-ohjelman suunnittelun ja juontamisen useina vuosina erillisten sopimusten perusteella katsottiin olleen yhdenjaksoista ja TEL:n piiriin kuuluvaa. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. V -jaosto