Insurance court denied widow's family pension due to prior marriage history and lack of children.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Insurance Court dismissed the widow's claim for a family pension, ruling that her eligibility was negated by her prior marital history. Although she had been married twice and lived with her first husband until his death, the court found no qualifying children to support the pension. The decision relied on the statutory requirement that a widow must have children or meet specific age and dependency criteria to receive the benefit.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedFamily pension Act; Insurance Act: A widow is not entitled to a family pension if she has no children and the statutory conditions regarding prior marriages and age are not met.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Puolisot olivat olleet avioliitossa keskenään kaksi kertaa ja asuneet yhdessä myös avioerossa ollessaan. Mies oli kuollut ennen kuin toinen avioliitto oli jatkunut kolmea vuotta. Leski oli miehen kuollessa ollut yli 40-vuotias eikä hänellä ollut perhe-eläkkeeseen oikeuttavaa lasta. Perhe-eläke evättiin. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. Laajennettu jaosto (äänestys 4-3) Vertaa VAKO D:469:84 (äänestys 9-5) Täysistunto