Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VakO 4.6.1981/6575:79 AI generated

Insurance court ruled free-time accident compensation is not a benefit under TEL 8 § 1 for settlement purposes.

Case Number VakO 4.6.1981/6575:79
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court dismissed the applicant's request to include free-time accident compensation in the settlement calculation under TEL 8 § 1. The applicant argued this benefit should be considered, while the opposing party contended it was merely a supplementary insurance not equivalent to a statutory benefit. The court determined that the compensation under the Accident Insurance Act did not meet the legal definition of a benefit subject to adjustment in the settlement.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Tapaturmavakuutuslain 57 §:n 2 mom; TEL 8 § 1 mom: Free-time accident compensation is not a benefit to be considered in settlement negotiations.

Keywords

AI generated
free-time accident compensation settlement calculation statutory benefit insurance court ruling supplementary insurance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Tapaturmavakuutuslain 57 § 2 mom
TEL 8 § 1 mom

Cited Case Law

AI generated
V -jaosto Työeläke 1/66
V -jaosto Työeläke 1/66, 2/77, 6/81
V -jaosto Työeläke 2/77
V -jaosto Työeläke 6/81
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Tapaturmavakuutuslain 57 §:n 2 mom:n mukainen työntekijäin vapaa-ajan tapaturmavakuutukseen perustuva korvaus ei ollut sellainen TEL 8 §:n 1 mom:ssa tarkoitettu etuus, joka olisi otettava huomioon yhteensovituksessa. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. V -jaosto Työeläke 1/66, 2/77, 6/81