Insurance court ruled free-time accident compensation is not a benefit under TEL 8 § 1 for settlement purposes.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Insurance Court dismissed the applicant's request to include free-time accident compensation in the settlement calculation under TEL 8 § 1. The applicant argued this benefit should be considered, while the opposing party contended it was merely a supplementary insurance not equivalent to a statutory benefit. The court determined that the compensation under the Accident Insurance Act did not meet the legal definition of a benefit subject to adjustment in the settlement.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedTapaturmavakuutuslain 57 §:n 2 mom; TEL 8 § 1 mom: Free-time accident compensation is not a benefit to be considered in settlement negotiations.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Tapaturmavakuutuslain 57 §:n 2 mom:n mukainen työntekijäin vapaa-ajan tapaturmavakuutukseen perustuva korvaus ei ollut sellainen TEL 8 §:n 1 mom:ssa tarkoitettu etuus, joka olisi otettava huomioon yhteensovituksessa. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. V -jaosto Työeläke 1/66, 2/77, 6/81