Student family member's continuous residence on farm for 23 months but not continuous farming activity for 4 months disqualifies student status.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Insurance Court reversed the Pensions Board's decision regarding a student family member's eligibility for benefits. Although the individual resided on their family farm for 23 months, they failed to engage in continuous farming operations for at least four consecutive months. The court ruled that the lack of continuous agricultural activity prevented the person from qualifying as a student in the legal sense.
Legislator headnote
AI generateds. 10.1.1. Työeläkelain (1970) 1001; s. 10.1.2. Työeläkelain (1970) 1001: A family member residing on a farm for an extended period does not qualify as a student if they do not engage in continuous farming operations for at least four consecutive months.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Opiskelija-perheenjäsen oli työskennellyt neljänä kesänä kotitilallaan 23 kuukautta kerrallaan asuen vain tällöin tilalla. Hän ei ollut harjoittanut maatilataloutta siten, että toiminnan voitiin katsoa jatkuneen yhdenjaksoisesti vähintään neljä kuukautta. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin. I -jaosto VAKO 12007:77, Työeläke 2/79, 2/81, 6/81