Insurance court denied claim that criminal compensation exceeds civil damages when refusing tort claims.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Insurance Court dismissed the applicant's request to refuse a tort-based compensation claim on the grounds that the criminal defendant owed greater civil damages. The applicant argued that the existence of a larger criminal compensation should bar the tort claim, but the court found no legal basis for such a defense. Consequently, the court ruled that the insurance authority has no right to deny the tort claim based on the amount of criminal compensation awarded.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedTapaturmavirastolaki 1981; 10 §: The insurance court lacks the authority to refuse a tort-based compensation claim by invoking that the criminal defendant is liable for greater civil damages to the victim.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Tapaturmavirastolla ei ole oikeutta kieltäytyä suorittamasta pahoinpitelyyn perustuvaa vahingonkorvausta siihen vedoten, että rikoksentekijällä on tuomion nojalla vahingonkorvausta suurempi yksityisoikeudellinen saatava vahingoittuneelta. IV-jaosto