Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 26.8.1981/11909:79 AI generated

Insurance court dismissed disability pension claim for commercial orchard work as it falls under YEL, not MYEL.

Case Number VakO 26.8.1981/11909:79
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The insurance court dismissed the applicant's request to revoke a work income decision based on disability pension grounds. The applicant, a 56-year-old farmer, argued that his commercial orchard activities should be covered by the YEL scheme, yet the court maintained the original decision remained valid. The court ruled that the specific agricultural practices did not constitute a compelling reason to overturn the prior determination that the work fell within the YEL scope.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

MELA 1971:1211 § 1; MELA 1971:1211 § 2: The court determined that the applicant's commercial orchard activities were properly classified under the YEL scheme, and the lack of compelling reasons precluded the revocation of the original work income decision.

Keywords

AI generated
commercial orchard activities YEL insurance scheme MYEL disability pension work income decision disability pension claim agricultural work classification revocation of decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
MELA 1971:1211 § 1
MELA 1971:1211 § 2
AI generated
insurance_1984_5226-1982
Insurance court dismissed sister's claim for work income allowance due to brother's prior approval of land area.
insurance_1983_4254-1982
Insurance court dismissed invalidation request for disability pension where insured continued acting as farm manager post-transfer.
insurance_1978_3707-1977
Insurance court dismissed removal of income benefit for farmer's spouse working on husband's farm.
insurance_2010_3816-2008
Appeal court dismissed claim that panel member was biased by hearing case twice in same dispute.
insurance_1979_1023-1977
Insurance court ruled insulation work on existing industrial piping is not building work under LEL Act.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

1,72 hehtaaria peltoa ja 8,57 hehtaria metsää käsittävällä tilalla oli harjoitettu kauppapuutarhaa. Tilalla oli sekä MYEL:n että YEL:n mukainen vakuutus. MYEL-työtuloa oli poikkeuksellisen viljelytavan perusteella korotettu. MELA:n 12.12.1979 56 -vuotiaan isännän työkyvyttömyyseläkehakemuksen jälkeen tekemästä purkuhakemuksesta sillä perusteella, että kauppapuutarhatoiminta kuului YEL:n piiriin, sen 29.11.1970 antamaa työtulopäätöstä ei purettu, koska hakemuksen tueksi ei ollut esitetty erittäin painavia syitä. Laajennettu jaosto (äänestys 6-1)