Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 1.2.1979/9924:77 AI generated

Insurance court denied new settlement due to unchanged benefit name and amount under traffic insurance law.

Case Number VakO 1.2.1979/9924:77
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The insurance court dismissed the applicant's request for a new settlement regarding traffic insurance benefits. The applicant argued that changes to the benefit name and amount required a fresh negotiation, but the court found no such obligation. Consequently, the decision to maintain the existing settlement without further adjustment was upheld.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Liikennevakuutuslain 10 §; Tapaturmavakuutuslain 10 §: A change in the designation or amount of a continuous benefit under traffic insurance law does not obligate the pension authority to conduct a new settlement if the underlying compensation remains substantively unchanged.

Keywords

AI generated
traffic insurance law continuous benefit settlement obligation pension authority benefit designation change

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Liikennevakuutuslain 10 §
Tapaturmavakuutuslain 10 §
AI generated
insurance_1982_6495-1979
Court allows partial adjustment of traffic insurance compensation when it exceeds accident insurance benefits.
insurance_2010_4419-2009
Insurance court dismissed pension fund's appeal to recalculate pension without consent after final prior decision.
insurance_2003_3625-2001
Insurance court allowed appeal by overturning pension board decision regarding deceased spouse's disability pension calculation.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2025:59
Supreme Court allows insurance company to deduct pensions from traffic accident loss compensation to prevent unjust enrichment.
insurance_1972_7815-1971
Insurance court denied pension offset for traffic accident disability benefits under TEL 8 § 1.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Henkilö oli saanut 24.10.1974 alkaen liikennevakuutuslain mukista työansionmenetyksestä myönnettyä korvausta. LEL:n mukainen työkyvyttömyyseläke oli myönnetty 1.11.1974 alkaen. Yhteensovituksessa oli otettu huomioon liikennevakuutuslain ja tapaturmavakuutuslain mukaiset korvaukset. Liikennevakuutuslain mukaisen jatkuvan korvauksen nimikkeen ja määrän muuttuminen ei oikeuttanut eläkelaitosta suorittamaan uutta yhteensovitusta. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. II -jaosto VAKO 7735:76, 2063:82