Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VakO 14.2.1979/414:78 AI generated

Insurance court dismissed claim against insurer when insured was sole owner of farm under will.

Case Number VakO 14.2.1979/414:78
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The insurance court dismissed the applicant's claim against the insurer, ruling that the insured was not liable as an 'insured person' under the MYEL policy. The farm had passed to the widow via will, and the sons residing on the farm did not claim their statutory share. Consequently, the widow remained the sole owner and manager, excluding the sons from the definition of insured persons required for coverage.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

s. 10.1.1. MYEL; The insurer is not liable for losses occurring on a farm when the insured is the sole owner and manager, and other family members residing there have not claimed their statutory share of ownership.

Keywords

AI generated
farm ownership will inheritance MYEL policy insured person definition family share claim sole management insurance liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
s. 10.1.1. MYEL
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kun maatila oli testamentin nojalla jäänyt emännän omistukseen ja hallintaan eivätkä tilalla asuvat pojat olleet vaatineet lakiosaansa, poikia ei tullut vakuuttaa MYEL:n mukaisesti isäntinä. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin. I -jaosto