Insurance court dismissed claim against insurer when insured was sole owner of farm under will.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe insurance court dismissed the applicant's claim against the insurer, ruling that the insured was not liable as an 'insured person' under the MYEL policy. The farm had passed to the widow via will, and the sons residing on the farm did not claim their statutory share. Consequently, the widow remained the sole owner and manager, excluding the sons from the definition of insured persons required for coverage.
Legislator headnote
AI generateds. 10.1.1. MYEL; The insurer is not liable for losses occurring on a farm when the insured is the sole owner and manager, and other family members residing there have not claimed their statutory share of ownership.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Kun maatila oli testamentin nojalla jäänyt emännän omistukseen ja hallintaan eivätkä tilalla asuvat pojat olleet vaatineet lakiosaansa, poikia ei tullut vakuuttaa MYEL:n mukaisesti isäntinä. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin. I -jaosto