Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 13.6.1979/2776:78 AI generated

Insurance court dismissed claim for backdated pension benefits due to lack of statutory correction circumstances under MYEL 8 § 6.

Case Number VakO 13.6.1979/2776:78
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The insurance court dismissed the applicant's request to extend pension benefit coverage from 1972 to 1976. Although the applicant provided new evidence of work on the MELA farm, the court found no statutory circumstances under MYEL 8 § 6 to justify a retrospective correction of the work income. Consequently, the pension board's original decision to exclude the 1972 period remained valid, and the appeal was rejected.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

MYEL 8 § 6 mom.; A claim for retrospective adjustment of work income based on new evidence is inadmissible unless specific statutory correction circumstances exist, which were absent in this case.

Keywords

AI generated
retrospective correction work income adjustment statutory circumstances pension benefits evidence admissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
MYEL 8 § 6 mom.
AI generated
insurance_1983_948-1983
Insurance court dismissed pension annulment request due to lack of compelling reasons for correcting erroneous income data.
insurance_2004_5297-2003
Insurance court dismissed appeal against pension board's decision to recalculate pension without downward adjustment.
insurance_1985_2509-1984
Insurance court dismissed appeal when pension board failed to review start date of business activity.
insurance_1983_248-1982
Insurance court dismissed pension revocation claim where prior pension calculation included another person's insurance contributions.
insurance_1985_1269-1984
Insurance court dismissed appeal on pension decision regarding mandatory employer insurance coverage periods.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Viljelijä oli vakuutettu vuodesta 1976 lukien. Saatuaan uutta selvitystä hänen työskentelystään viljelmällä MELA vakuutti hänet jälkikäteen samalta tilalta 1972 alkaen. Eläkelaitos saattoi purkua hakematta vahvistaa työtulon jo 1972 lukien, koska kysymyksessä ei ollut MYEL 8 §:n 6 mom tarkoittama tarkistustilanne. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin. V -jaosto MYEL 8 §:n 6 mom., Työeläke 4/79