Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 2.2.1978/8866:76 AI generated

Insurance court dismissed pension decision removal and rejected recovery of undue benefit due to erroneous consolidation.

Case Number VakO 2.2.1978/8866:76
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The pension fund sought to revoke a pension decision based on erroneous consolidation and claimed the right to recover an undue benefit. The Insurance Court rejected the removal of the decision and ordered that the undue benefit remain unrecoverable. The court ruled that the erroneous consolidation did not justify overturning the original decision or allowing restitution of the benefit.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Insurance Act; Pension Act: Erroneous consolidation of pension decisions does not justify revocation of the original decision or recovery of undue benefits if the benefit was lawfully paid under the consolidated terms.

Keywords

AI generated
erroneous consolidation pension decision revocation undue benefit recovery Insurance Court of Finland pension law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Insurance Act
Pension Act

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I -jaosto VAKO 5076:79
I -jaosto VAKO 5076:79,483:80, Työeläke 4/78, 1/83
483:80
I -jaosto VAKO 5076:79,483:80, Työeläke 4/78, 1/83
Työeläke 4/78
I -jaosto VAKO 5076:79,483:80, Työeläke 4/78, 1/83
1/83
I -jaosto VAKO 5076:79,483:80, Työeläke 4/78, 1/83
AI generated
insurance_1980_1976-1979
Insurance court dismissed pension claim for repayment due to prior VI committee's final decision on non-recoverability.
insurance_1982_9344-1981
Social security court dismissed appeal for missing statutory notice on overpayment recovery procedure.
insurance_1970_7019-1969
Insurance court dismissed appeal due to lack of legal interest regarding retroactively granted pension payment.
insurance_1977_14-1977
Court allowed suspension of pension due to valid reasons for refusing vocational training.
insurance_2006_909-2005
Pension fund's failure to submit appeal document kept decision non-final, barring its removal by insurance court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Eläkelaitos oli hakenut eläkepäätöksen poistamista virheellisesti suoritetun yhteensovituksen vuoksi ja samalla anonut oikeutta aiheettomasta maksetun edun takaisin perimiseen. VAKO poisti päätöksen, mutta aiheettomasti maksettu etu oli jätettävä takaisin perimättä. I -jaosto VAKO 5076:79,483:80, Työeläke 4/78, 1/83