Insurance court ruled state compensation for stolen funds must be treated as property damage under the Criminal Damage Act.

The First Chamber of the Insurance Court ruled that damages arising from the misappropriation of funds must be classified as property damage under the Act on Compensation for Damage Caused by Crime from State Funds. The applicant argued for this classification to secure state compensation, while the opposing party likely contested the nature of the loss. The court accepted the applicant's position, establishing that such financial losses fall within the statutory definition of property damage.