Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 8.9.1977/14:77 AI generated

Court allowed suspension of pension due to valid reasons for refusing vocational training.

Case Number VakO 8.9.1977/14:77
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court modified the pension board's decision to resume pension payments after the claimant ceased studies. The claimant stopped training due to personal illness and family difficulties, while the pension board suspended payments citing refusal without valid cause under TEL 8 b §. The court ruled that the claimant's health and family issues constituted valid reasons, necessitating the resumption of benefits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

TEL 8 b §:n 1 mom; When a pension recipient refuses vocational training due to valid personal or family health reasons, the pension board must resume payments rather than suspend them.

Keywords

AI generated
pension suspension vocational training refusal valid health reasons family difficulties TEL 8 b section pension board decision resumption of benefits

Cited Legislation

AI generated
TEL 8 b § 1 mom
AI generated
insurance_1978_8866-1976
Insurance court dismissed pension decision removal and rejected recovery of undue benefit due to erroneous consolidation.
insurance_2012_4165-2011
Voluntary accident insurance benefits deemed statutory compensation for disability support deduction purposes under Finnish law.
insurance_1994_878-1994
Pension court dismissed pension decision removal request due to lack of new information on disability onset date.
insurance_1984_5865-1983
Insurance court dismissed veteran's early pension claim after reviewing legislative provisions and procedural history.
insurance_1970_7019-1969
Insurance court dismissed appeal due to lack of legal interest regarding retroactively granted pension payment.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Eläkelaitos oli myöntänyt henkilölle määräaikaisen työkyvyttömyyseläkkeen. Vakuutusalan Kuntouttamiskeskuksen suosituksesta eläkelaitos oli lisäksi päättänyt kustantaa hänelle ammattikoulutuksen 3-vuotisessa teknillisessä koulussa. Henkilön ilmoitettua lopettaneensa opiskelun sekä oman sairautensa että perheessä esiintyvien vaikeuksien ja vakavan sairauden vuoksi, eläkelaitos keskeytti eläkkeen maksamisen TEL 8 b §:n 1 mom:n nojalla katsoen henkilön kieltäytyneen koulutuksesta ilman pätevää syytä. VAKO: Eläkkeen maksamista ei ollut syytä keskeyttää. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin. VI -jaosto