Insurance court dismissed claim for additional benefits due to lack of statutory entitlement under Finnish Insurance Act.

The Finnish Insurance Court dismissed the applicant's claim for additional insurance benefits, ruling that no statutory basis existed for such payment. The applicant argued that the policy terms implied a right to supplementary benefits, but the court found no supporting language in the contract or law. Consequently, the court held that without explicit legislative authorization, the insurer was not obligated to provide these additional benefits.