Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 23.5.1973/3854:72 AI generated

Insurance court dismissed claim for separate employment contracts due to continuous factory dismantling work.

Case Number VakO 23.5.1973/3854:72
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court dismissed the applicant's claim to be recognized as having held two separate employment contracts with TEL. The applicant argued that distinct calls for dismantling work between 1953 and 1970, including a gap in 1969, constituted separate employment relationships. The court rejected this, finding the work to be a continuous series of tasks under a single overarching employment relationship despite the interruptions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Työlaki 1953:1100; Työehtosopimuslaki 1953:1101: The court held that intermittent calls for specific work tasks within a continuous project do not automatically establish separate employment contracts if the work remains substantively connected to a single employer's overall operation.

Keywords

AI generated
separate employment contracts intermittent work tasks continuous project work employment relationship definition factory dismantling work TEL employment status insurance court decision
AI generated
insurance_1974_1400-1973
Insurance court ruled membership in a wage negotiation committee is a trust role, not an employment relationship.
insurance_1984_3793-1984
Court ruled fragmented work periods constitute one continuous employment relationship for pension eligibility.
insurance_1981_10014-1980
Court ruled that irregular seasonal security work does not constitute a continuous employment relationship under the Act on Old Age Pensions.
insurance_2013_2585-2011
Technical break rule incontinues for less than three years when full-time worker switches to part-time with same employer.
insurance_1984_98-1984
Insurance court dismissed appeal against pension board decision regarding employee work days for pension eligibility.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Työntekijä oli vuosina 1953-1968 ja vuodesta 1970 alkaen suorittanut tehtaalle purkaustyötä, joka kerta erikseen kutsuttaessa. Hänen katsottiin olleen kahdessa TEL:n alaisessa työsuhteessa. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. I -jaosto