Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VakO 29.11.1972/8933:71 AI generated

Insurance court dismissed employer appeal as lacking direct legal interest in pension decision.

Case Number VakO 29.11.1972/8933:71
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Insurance Court dismissed the employer's appeal against the pension board's decision granting disability pension. The employer argued the pension should not have been granted, but the court found no direct legal interest for the employer to challenge the decision. Consequently, the appeal was rejected without further examination.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Vakuutusoikeus 1 §; Työeläkelaki 1 §: An employer lacks standing to appeal a pension decision unless they have a direct legal interest in the outcome.

Keywords

AI generated
standing to appeal direct legal interest employer appeal disability pension insurance court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Vakuutusoikeus 1 §
Työeläkelaki 1 §
AI generated
insurance_1982_10499-1981
Insurance court dismissed request to revoke old pension decision due to conflicting state pension grant.
insurance_1972_6344-1971
Insurance court dismissed employer's appeal regarding employee status determination by pension fund decision.
kko-other_2006_1910
Supreme Court dismisses pension claim where employment contract requirement was waived by pension fund rule change.
insurance_1984_1907-1983
Insurance court dismissed appeal regarding pension type change from partial to full disability pension.
insurance_1987_1318-1986
Reinstatement to same employer after service triggers continuous service leave, requiring pension from all periods.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Eläkelaitos myönsi henkilölle työkyvyttömyyseläkkeen. Työnantaja valitti päätöksestä katsoen, ettei eläkettä olisi ollut myönnettävä. Valitus jätettiin tutkimatta, koska työnantajalla ei ollut asiassa välitöntä oikeudellista etua valvottavanaan. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. III -jaosto VAKO 6344:72, Työeläke 2/75, 1/78