Insurance Court dismissed claim that freelance writers were employees of publishing companies based on payment structure.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe III Chamber dismissed the claim that two writers and a series contributor were employees of their respective publishing companies. The writers performed tasks from home and received irregular payments of 600, 400, and 1,000 marks per month from different entities. The court determined that the lack of regular salary, fixed working hours, and direct subordination indicated independent contractor status rather than an employment relationship.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedInsurance Act Chapter 1 Section 1; Insurance Act Chapter 1 Section 2: A person performing occasional writing tasks from home and receiving irregular payments from multiple entities is not considered an employee but an independent contractor.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Kahteen aikakauslehteen kirjoituksia laatineen ja kolmanteen erästä sarjaa toimittaneen ei katsottu olleen työsuhteessa lehtien kustannusyhtiöihin. Toimittajalle, joka teki kirjoitustyön kotonaan, maksoivat eri yhtiöt palkkioina 600, 400 ja 1.000 mk/kk. III -jaosto