Contractor not an employee; no labor law applies to independent service agreement dispute.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Insurance Court dismissed the applicant's claim against the company regarding alleged labor law violations. The court found that the applicant, who sold machine drawings and supervised prototype production, was not subordinate to the company's management and thus lacked an employment relationship. Consequently, the pension board's decision was upheld because the dispute concerned a civil contract rather than labor law.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedInsurance Act; Employment Protection Act: A contractor providing technical drawings and supervision without managerial subordination is not an employee, and labor law protections do not apply to such independent service agreements.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Henkilö oli myynyt suunnittelemansa konepiirustukset osakeyhtiölle ja sitoutunut valvomaan mallikappaleen valmistusta ja osallistumaan esittelytyöhön. Hän ei ollut osakeyhtiön johdon ja valvonnan alainen eikä siten työsuhteessa yhtiöön. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. III -jaosto