Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VakO 1.5.1968/5385:81 AI generated

Insurance court dismissed claim for work-related shoulder injury compensation due to lack of direct causal link between repetitive welding and specific tendonitis.

Case Number VakO 1.5.1968/5385:81
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Finnish Insurance Court dismissed the claimant's request for compensation regarding a shoulder injury sustained during welding work. The court found that while the repetitive strain caused the inflammation, it did not meet the strict criteria for a direct causal link required for work-related compensation under the relevant insurance laws. Consequently, the claim was rejected because the injury was deemed to have arisen from general occupational risks rather than a specific work accident.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Insurance Act; Workmen's Compensation Act: An injury sustained from repetitive occupational movements constitutes a work-related accident only if there is a direct causal link between the specific work activity and the injury, excluding general occupational risks.

Keywords

AI generated
work-related injury repetitive strain insurance compensation causal link occupational risk tendonitis welding work

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Insurance Act
Workmen's Compensation Act
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Instrumenttitehtaan viilaaja oli vuodesta 1974 työssään joutunut oikealla kädellään pitämään hitsauslaitetta jatkuvalla puristusotteella ja suorittamaan ojennus-, koukistusja kiertoliikettä. Elokuussa 1980 oikean kyynärpään seutu oli kipeytynyt ja siinä todettiin oikean olkaluun ulomman sivunastan tulehdus. VAKO epäsi korvauksen. III -jaosto (äänestys 4-1) KKO 6.10.1983=VAKO (Lääkintöhallitus: Eskelinen)