Insurance court dismissed claim for work-related shoulder injury compensation due to lack of direct causal link between repetitive welding and specific tendonitis.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Finnish Insurance Court dismissed the claimant's request for compensation regarding a shoulder injury sustained during welding work. The court found that while the repetitive strain caused the inflammation, it did not meet the strict criteria for a direct causal link required for work-related compensation under the relevant insurance laws. Consequently, the claim was rejected because the injury was deemed to have arisen from general occupational risks rather than a specific work accident.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedInsurance Act; Workmen's Compensation Act: An injury sustained from repetitive occupational movements constitutes a work-related accident only if there is a direct causal link between the specific work activity and the injury, excluding general occupational risks.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Instrumenttitehtaan viilaaja oli vuodesta 1974 työssään joutunut oikealla kädellään pitämään hitsauslaitetta jatkuvalla puristusotteella ja suorittamaan ojennus-, koukistusja kiertoliikettä. Elokuussa 1980 oikean kyynärpään seutu oli kipeytynyt ja siinä todettiin oikean olkaluun ulomman sivunastan tulehdus. VAKO epäsi korvauksen. III -jaosto (äänestys 4-1) KKO 6.10.1983=VAKO (Lääkintöhallitus: Eskelinen)