Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vaasan HO 27.11.1986 2075/86 AI generated

Challenge to bankruptcy petition service on Sunday was dismissed as too late under Finnish law.

Case Number Vaasan HO 27.11.1986 2075/86
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the challenge to the bankruptcy petition because it was served on Monday, following a Sunday deadline. The appellant argued the service was invalid due to the day of the week, while the respondent maintained the procedural order was correct. The court ruled that since the relevant calculation law did not apply, the Sunday deadline was strict, rendering the Monday service untimely.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Konkurssisäännön 47 §; Oikeudenkäymiskaaren 11 luvun 11 §:n mukainen haasteen tiedoksianto seuraavan päivän jälkeen määräajan päätyttyä on liian myöhäinen, jolloin kanne jätetään tutkimatta.

Keywords

AI generated
bankruptcy petition challenge service of process deadline Sunday service invalidity procedural time limits Finnish bankruptcy law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Konkurssisäännön 47 §
Konkurssisäännön 47 §:ssä mainittua takaisinsaantia konkurssipesään koskevan haasteen tiedoksiantamisen viimeinen päivä oli sunnuntai.
oikeudenkäymiskaaren 11 luvun 11 §
Haasteen tiedoksianto vastaajalle oli toimitettu oikeudenkäymiskaaren 11 luvun 11 §:n mukaisessa järjestyksessä vasta seuranneena maanantaina.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KKO:1964-II-41
KKO:1974-II-21
AI generated
kko-precedent_1999_4
Supreme Court allows late bankruptcy recovery claims by applying the holy day rule to statutory limitation periods.
kko-other_2022_430
Supreme Court allows deportation order in deportation case where client failed to prove right to stay.
kko-precedent_1997_203
Supreme Court allows late divorce property separation claim by applying procedural time limit rules to filing date instead of service date.
kko-other_2024_1270
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding one-sided judgment notification requirements for granting further stay of execution permission.
kko-precedent_1999_60
Supreme Court dismisses late recovery claim because debtor's books clearly showed the basis for recovery. The court held that the administrator failed to discover the basis within the primary deadline. The claim was rejected as filed too late due to lack of diligence. The administrator could not rely on the extended deadline. The claim was dismissed as filed too late. The administrator failed to discover the basis within the primary deadline. The claim was rejected as filed too late due to lack of diligence. The administrator could not rely on the extended deadline.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Konkurssisäännön 47 §:ssä mainittua takaisinsaantia konkurssipesään koskevan haasteen tiedoksiantamisen viimeinen päivä oli sunnuntai. Haasteen tiedoksianto vastaajalle oli toimitettu oikeudenkäymiskaaren 11 luvun 11 §:n mukaisessa järjestyksessä vasta seuranneena maanantaina. Kun säädettyjen määräaikain laskemisesta annettua lakia sen 1 §:n mukaan ei ollut sovellettava, ja haastaminen siis oli tapahtunut liian myöhään, kanne jätettiin tutkimatta.

Vrt. KKO:1964-II-41

KKO:1974-II-21

III-jaosto

Lainvoimainen