Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Turun HO 11.04.1986 TU-247 AI generated

Court allows interest claim in maritime damage case where lower court previously dismissed it.

Case Number Turun HO 11.04.1986 TU-247
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal allowed the claim for interest in a maritime damage case after the lower court had previously dismissed it. The Maritime Board initially requested interest when seeking administrative review, but the lower court failed to examine this specific claim. The Court of Appeal found no legal barrier to reviewing the interest claim upon remand.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Maritime Act; Maritime Board Act: The court may examine a claim for interest on damages if the administrative authority originally requested it, even if the lower court previously dismissed the claim without addressing it.

Keywords

AI generated
maritime damage claims interest on damages administrative review lower court dismissal Court of Appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Maritime Act
Maritime Board Act
AI generated
appeal_1986_helsinki__2524
Court awarded 16% interest on 1982 damages claims as they were not delayed under the Interest Act.
appeal_1984_eastern-finland__2394
Appeal court allows state compensation for litigation costs when increasing damages in civil proceedings.
kko-other_2006_720
Supreme Court dismissed client's claim for increased damages due to changed trial circumstances without prior appeal.
insurance_1988_2521-1988
Insurance court dismissed claim; appeal court allowed it as a special reason for late filing under Insurance Act.
kko-other_1999_1823
Supreme Court allows appeal regarding payment made after lower court judgment to be considered in final ruling.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Raastuvanoikeuden jätettyä A:ta vastaan ajetussa syyteasiassa merenkulkuhallituksen haastetta ottamatta A:han kohdistaman vahingonkorvausvaatimuksen tutkittavaksi ottamatta merenkulkuhallitus oli vasta hakiessaan muutosta hovioikeudessa vaatinut vahingonkorvaukselle korkoa. Hovioikeuden palautettua asian vahingonkorvauksen osalta raastuvanoikeuteen merenkulkuhallitus oli siellä uudistanut myös korkovaatimuksen. Hovioikeus katsoi, ettei korkovaatimuksen tutkimiselle asiassa ollut estettä. (Ään.)

Läsnä: Heikola - Schrey - Renvall (erim.) - Onninen (erim.) - Saarinen Esittelijä: P. Mikkola

Lainvoimainen