Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Helsingin HO 25.11.1986 1953 AI generated

Court convicted defendant of aggravated conspiracy for misappropriating state funds totaling 37,104 marks.

Case Number Helsingin HO 25.11.1986 1953
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal upheld the conviction for aggravated conspiracy based on the defendant's misappropriation of state funds. The prosecution argued for continued aggravated conspiracy charges, while the court emphasized evaluating the defendant's conduct as a whole. Considering the substantial total amount embezzled and the specific circumstances, the court determined the actions constituted aggravated conspiracy.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 10 of the Penal Code; Section 10 of the Penal Code: The court established that misappropriation of state funds, when evaluated as a whole considering the total amount and circumstances, constitutes aggravated conspiracy.

Keywords

AI generated
aggravated conspiracy misappropriation of funds state funds total amount criminal conviction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 10 of the Penal Code

Cited Case Law

AI generated
RHO T:1284/84, A:15.1.1985 (R83/1236)
RHO T:1284/84, A:15.1.1985 (R83/1236)
AI generated
kko-precedent_2016_45
Supreme Court dismisses criminal charges and civil claims due to excessive trial delay and lack of victim's right to continue.
kko-other_2025_115
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding refusal of continued detention order based on serious crime grounds.
appeal_1985_rovaniemi__1284
Court held that multiple embezzlements constitute one crime unless one instance is exceptionally severe.
appeal_1983_helsinki__2012
Court of Appeal upheld mandatory life imprisonment for repeat burglary despite youth and prior record.
kko-other_1996_3939
Supreme Court allows conditional release for a bank employee sentenced to two years for serious conspiracy.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Syytetty oli toimiessaan 1983-7.4.1985 välisenä aikana lentoaseman pysäköinninvalvojana anastanut hallussaan olleita ilmailuhallituksen varoja noin 300-500 markan erissä yhteensä 37.104 markkaa.

Virallinen syyttäjä oli vaatinut syytetylle rangaistusta jatketusta törkeästä kavalluksesta. KO oli katsonut syytetyn syyllistyneen jatkettuun kavallukseen.

Hovioikeuden mukaan syytetyn menettelyä oli arvosteltava yhtenä kokonaisuutena ja huomioon ottaen anastettujen varojen suuri kokonaismäärä sekä rikokseen johtaneet ja siitä ilmenevät seikat kokonaisuudessaan katsoi syytetyn syyllistyneen törkeään kavallukseen.

Vrt. RHO T:1284/84, A:15.1.1985 (R83/1236)

Asko Lehtonen, Juha Vikatmaa: Varallisuusrikosuudistus

1972, Turku 1977, ss. 43

Läsnä: Hiltunen, Hirvonen ja Niemelä (apuj.) Esittelijä: Paavonkallio

Lainvoimainen