Court dismisses prosecution for absence from trial when two years have passed since decision date.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court of appeal dismissed the prosecution's case against A. for failing to appear as a respondent. Although the respondent was absent without legal impediment and the prosecution failed to submit a statement, the prosecution waited two years before the decision was made. The court ruled that the prosecution's right to punish for this absence had expired under the relevant statute of limitations provisions.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedRL 8:1 § 1 mom. 4 kohda; OK 12:17 § 1 mom. The prosecution's right to impose a penalty for a respondent's absence from trial expires if two years pass between the absence and the decision date.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
A. oli syyteasiassa ollut ilman laillista estettä poissa RO:sta vastaajana. RO ei ollut antanut siitä lausuntoa. Kun poissaolosta HO:n päätöksen antopäivään oli kulunut kaksi vuotta, oikeus tuomita A. poissaolosta rangaistukseen oli RL 8:1 § 1 mom. 4 kohdan mukaan verrattuna OK 12:17 § 1 mom:iin rauennut.
Ks. KKO:1981-II-154
Läsnä: Heikkilä, Vihuri (apuj.) ja Hokkanen (apuj.) Esittelijä: Soikkeli
Lainvoimainen