Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Helsingin HO 12.02.1986 190 AI generated

Tenant must vacate building if demolition permit is granted despite landlord's termination claim.

Case Number Helsingin HO 12.02.1986 190
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal ordered the tenant to vacate the premises pending a final decision on the building's demolition. The landlord terminated the lease citing planned demolition, but the regional administration had previously imposed a prohibition on demolition under the Building Protection Act. The court ruled that since the legality of the demolition depended on the administrative authority's decision, the tenant could not remain in the property.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Building Protection Act; Building Protection Act: When a building's demolition is subject to a pending administrative decision prohibiting demolition, a lease termination based on such demolition does not justify the tenant's continued occupancy.

Keywords

AI generated
Building Protection Act demolition prohibition lease termination tenant obligation administrative decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Building Protection Act
AI generated
ECLI:FI:KKO:2022:61
Tenant's failure to clean and store excessive items justified landlord's termination of tenancy agreement.
kko-precedent_1991_78
Tenant's unjustified termination of lease requires landlord to mitigate damages by re-leasing at lower rent.
admin_2019_helsinki__850
Administrative court dismissed appeal against fine imposed on leaseholder for failing to demolish dangerous structures.
appeal_1979_helsinki__368
Tenant eviction allowed due to heavy reason of building demolition for new construction.
appeal_1976_turku__4019
Tenant's rent reduction claim dismissed because no repair demand was made prior to withholding rent.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Vuokranantajan irtisanottua vuokrasopimuksen sillä perusteella, että rakennus tullaan purkamaan uudisrakentamista varten ja tehtyä kaupungin rakennuslautakunnalle asianmukaisen purkuilmoituksen, lääninhallitus oli rakennussuojelulain nojalla määrännyt rakennuksen toimenpidekieltoon, kunnes suojeluasia oli lainvoimaisesti ratkaistu. Kun vuokranantajan oikeus purkaa rakennus ja irtisanomisperusteen lainmukaisuus siten olivat tulleet riippumaan viranomaisen vastaisesta päätöksestä, HO velvoitti vuokralaisen muuttamaan edellyttäen, että suojeluesitys hylätään lainvoimaisesti.

Läsnä: Poukka (erim.), Mäkelä (erim), Mäki,

Pohjola (asiant.) ja Schalin (asiant., erim.) Esittelijä: Kainulainen

Lainvoimainen