Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Helsingin HO 05.02.1986 1217 AI generated

Child support deduction for visitation allowed if visitation lasts at least seven consecutive days.

Case Number Helsingin HO 05.02.1986 1217
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court upheld the decision allowing a deduction from child support when the custodial parent maintains continuous visitation for at least seven days during summer vacation. The parties argued regarding the specific duration required to qualify for the monthly support reduction. The court ruled that the statutory requirement of seven consecutive days was met, thereby permitting the calculated deduction within the six-month post-visit window.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

s. 10 of the Child Custody Act 1973; s. 11 of the Child Custody Act 1973: A deduction from child support for visitation is permitted only if the visitation is maintained continuously for at least seven days.

Keywords

AI generated
child support deduction visitation duration consecutive days requirement summer vacation custody monthly support reduction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
s. 10 of the Child Custody Act 1973
s. 11 of the Child Custody Act 1973
AI generated
kko-precedent_1998_4
Supreme Court allows alimony increase when recipient fails to provide income evidence, bearing adverse consequences.
kko-other_1997_3749
Supreme Court allows temporary custody order to extend for child support determination period.
admin_1986_central-finland-county__1075
Child support payment reduced due to lack of stated reason for lower amount in agreement.
kko-precedent_1991_27
Supreme Court voids child support for period child lived with father due to custody change.
kko-precedent_1995_121
Supreme Court allows child support increase where initial award lacked factual basis and was unreasonable.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A oli asumuseropäätöksessä oikeutettu pitämään luonaan B:n huoltoon uskottuja lapsiaan neljä viikkoa kesäloman aikana.

A:n lapsille maksettavan elatusavun suhteen määrättiin, että A sai luonapidon kestettyä yhtäjaksoisesti vähintään seitsemän vuorokautta vähentää sen kuukauden elatusmaksusta, jonka aikana luonapito oli tapahtunut, jokaisen luonapitovuorokauden osalta 1/50 osan. Vähennystä ei kuitenkaan saanut tehdä myöhemmin kuin luonapidon päättymistä seuranneiden kuuden kalenterikuukauden aikana.

Läsnä: Heikkilä, Tikkanen ja Kari (apuj., erim.) Esittelijä: Seppänen

Lainvoimainen