Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vaasan HO 02.04.1985 334/85 AI generated

Court allowed sale and seizure prohibition when creditor provided probable grounds via application copy and delivery contract.

Case Number Vaasan HO 02.04.1985 334/85
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court permitted the sale and seizure prohibition against the debtor based on the creditor's submission of a probable grounds application copy and a delivery contract. While one judge argued the creditor had not sufficiently substantiated the claim, the majority found the evidence adequate to justify the measure. Consequently, the court ruled in favor of the creditor's request to restrict the debtor's assets.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

s. 24 of the Bankruptcy Act 1985; A sale and seizure prohibition may be granted when the creditor presents probable grounds for the claim through a copy of the application and a contract regarding the delivery of goods.

Keywords

AI generated
sale and seizure prohibition probable grounds requirement bankruptcy proceedings creditor's burden of proof asset restriction measure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
s. 24 of the Bankruptcy Act 1985
AI generated
kho-other_2016_61
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal against Sami Council's decision to retry 2015 elections due to procedural violations.
kko-other_1997_4493
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding conditions for compulsory measures under the Compulsory Measures Act.
kko-precedent_1992_185
Supreme Court of Finland rules that administrative documents in a monolingual municipality must be issued in the local language.
kko-other_2007_6
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding conditions for imposing appearance bans under Criminal Procedure Code Chapter 15 Section 10a.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2021:78
Supreme Court dismisses request for legal aid in restraining order case as statute only covers criminal prosecution proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Myymis- ja hukkaamiskieltoon suostuttiin, kun saatavan tueksi oli esitetty todennäköisiä perusteita: haastehakemuksen jäljennös ja tavaroiden toimitusta koskeva sopimus. (Ään.)

Eri mieltä ollut jäsen katsoi, ettei haettuun kieltoon voitu suostua, koskei velkoja ollut näyttänyt ottaneensa asiassa haastetta väittämästään saatavasta.

Ks. Erma ym.: Bankjuridik s. 311-312

Sinkkilä, Osmo: Takavarikko ja lainhakumenettely oikeudenkäyntiä

korvaavana menettelynä. Lakimiesliiton

koulutuskeskuksen julkaisusarja n:o 26. Konkurssi- ja ulosotto-oikeutta. s. 153-165

II-jaosto

Lainvoimainen