City prosecutor's challenge admissible despite later acting as prosecutor in same case.

The Court of Appeal allowed the city prosecutor's challenge to the indictment, ruling that prior service as a prosecutor in the case did not render the challenge inadmissible. The prosecutor argued that his later role as the state's attorney invalidated his standing to object to procedural defects. The court rejected this contention, holding that the procedural defect existed independently of the prosecutor's subsequent involvement in the proceedings.