Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Rovaniemen HO 06.03.1985 77/85 AI generated

Court dismisses mother's appeal on custody order, noting no separate custody ruling was legally required.

Case Number Rovaniemen HO 06.03.1985 77/85
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the mother's appeal regarding a custody order made by the lower court in connection with a residence dispute. Although the lower court had designated the minor child for the mother's care, the appellate court removed this specific statement from its final decision. The court ruled that since no separate custody ruling was legally mandated in the proceedings, the lower court lacked the authority to issue such an order.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Alius 10 §; 10 §: The court of appeal may not issue a custody order if the lower court was not legally required to make a separate custody ruling in the proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
custody order residence dispute appellate review lower court authority separate ruling requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Alius 10 §
AI generated
appeal_1982_kouvola__1663
Appeal dismissed; custody claim left unexamined by lower court due to procedural bar.
kko-other_2026_412
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding child sexual abuse case where continued proceedings permission was denied due to lack of new evidence.
appeal_1981_turku__836
Mother's custody of children overrides prior alimony obligation; court allows return of paid alimony.
appeal_1981_kouvola__183
Appeal court allowed husband's request to include second child in custody order upon divorce.
appeal_1984_helsinki__733
Court dismissed father's criminal charge for unauthorized car use where he did not report the offense to prosecutors.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Alioikeus oli isän kanteesta julistamansa asumuserotuomion yhteydessä määrännyt, että puolisoiden alaikäinen lapsi uskotaan äidin huoltoon.

Hovioikeus, jossa äiti haki muutosta asumuseroratkaisun osalta, pysytti alioikeuden päätöksen muutoin, mutta omasta aloitteestaan poisti lapsen huoltoa koskevan lausuman, koska tuomioistuimen päätöstä lapsen huoltoa koskevassa asiassa ei ollut vaadittu.

Läsnä: VK-SP apuj-MLP apuj Esittelijä: L.F. Miettinen

Lainvoimainen