Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Rovaniemen HO 14.03.1985 333/85 AI generated

Court convicted official for violent resistance, assault, and escape after intentionally injuring police officer.

Case Number Rovaniemen HO 14.03.1985 333/85
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court of appeal upheld the conviction of an official for violent resistance, assault, and escape. The official intentionally punched a police officer, causing a nosebleed, forcing the officer to abandon his duties and allowing the official to break free. The court ruled that the intentional infliction of injury constituted the necessary means for the violent resistance and escape, validating the lower court's findings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Laki viranomaisten väkivaltaisesta vastustamisesta (1985:100); Laki rikosasioista (1989:719): An official who intentionally injures a police officer to force them to abandon their duties and subsequently escapes is guilty of violent resistance, assault, and escape.

Keywords

AI generated
violent resistance official assault police escape intentional injury criminal conviction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Laki viranomaisten väkivaltaisesta vastustamisesta (1985:100)
Laki rikosasioista (1989:719)
AI generated
appeal_1983_kouvola__205
Court held violent resistance by official does not constitute separate crime of aggravated assault.
appeal_1983_eastern-finland__2367
Self-defense justified police coercion resistance when no duty to cooperate existed.
appeal_1983_eastern-finland__1122
Court dismisses appeal and upholds conviction for traffic offense with fine penalty.
kko-other_2005_346
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding police officer's use of force during screening procedures under specific conditions.
kko-precedent_2000_90
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; forced urine test via catheter not unlawful interference despite officer's lack of arrest warrant.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A oli, virantoimituksessa olleen poliisimiehen B:n pidätettyä hänet ja ryhdyttyä viemään häntä poliisiasemalle säilöön, tahallaan nyrkillä kasvoihin lyömällä aiheuttanut B:lle vertavuotavan vamman kasvoihin ja siten pakottanut B:n jättämään tekemättä virkatoimensa sekä päästyään irti B:n otteesta karannut B:n huostasta.

A tuomittiin yksin teoin tehdyistä virkamiehen väkivaltaisesta vastustamisesta, pahoinpitelystä ja vangin karkaamisesta.

Läsnä: TR-RS-RP Esittelijä: L.F. Paukkula

Lainvoimainen