Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Rovaniemen HO 31.12.1985 1222/85 AI generated

Court of Appeal upheld hunting ban due to minority vote on duration of penalty.

Case Number Rovaniemen HO 31.12.1985 1222/85
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal in Rovaniemi upheld the lower court's decision to impose a hunting ban on the defendant for a prolonged period. Although the defendant sought to shorten the ban, the majority of the panel rejected this request. The minority members, however, ruled that the ban should remain in effect for the duration originally set by the district court until the judgment became final.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Metsästyslaki 64 a § 1 momentti; The Court of Appeal may uphold a hunting ban imposed by a lower court for a specific duration even if the defendant requests a shorter period, provided the majority of the panel rejects the reduction and the judgment becomes final.

Keywords

AI generated
hunting ban duration minority vote effect finality of judgment penalty enforcement hunting law appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Metsästyslaki 64 a § 1 momentti

Cited Case Law

AI generated
VaaHO:n T:2382/81
AI generated
appeal_1982_vaasa__2382
Court of Appeal rules hunting ban starts when decision gains legal force, not when originally issued.
kko-precedent_1993_153
Supreme Court allows appeal filed in Swedish despite local court rules requiring Finnish language.
appeal_1984_rovaniemi__358
Court dismisses criminal prosecution due to victim's delayed reporting and lack of public interest.
appeal_1984_helsinki__199
Court convicted for continued absence from military summons despite prior dismissal due to statute of limitations.
kko-precedent_2006_27
Supreme Court allows appeal without leave for lawyer disbarment in same case as appeal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kihlakunnanoikeus oli tuomitessaan 19.6.1984 julistamallaan päätöksellä vastaajan yksin teoin tehdyistä luvattomasta metsästyksestä,

metsästysrikoksesta ja metsästysrikkomuksesta rangaistukseen samalla metsästyslain 64 a §:n 1 momentin nojalla määrännyt vastaajan metsästyskieltoon 18.6.1985 saakka.

Hovioikeus, jossa vain vastaaja haki muutosta, ei muuttanut kihlakunnanoikeuden päätöstä. (Ään. 13-3)

Vähemmistöön jääneet jäsenet tuomitsivat vastaajan metsästyskieltoon kihlakunnanoikeuden päätöksessä tarkoitetun pituiseksi ajaksi hovioikeuden päätöksen lainvoimaiseksi tulemisesta.

Vrt. VaaHO:n T:2382/81

Lainvoimainen