Holding that a hammer is not a weapon under the Weapons Act if intended for work or approved use.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the prosecution's charge against the defendant for possessing a hammer in public. The prosecution argued the hammer was a weapon suitable for assault, but the court found it was intended for work or approved use. Consequently, possession did not constitute a criminal offense under the Weapons Act.
Legislator headnote
AI generated4 § of the Weapons Act; Possession of an object intended for work or approved use is not a criminal offense even if it could theoretically be used for assault.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Kuulapäistä vasaraa ei pidetty teräaselain 4 §:ssä tarkoitettuna teräaseena, joka on tarkoitettu työvälineeksi tai muuhun hyväksyttävään käyttöön mutta joka soveltuu henkeen tai terveyteen kohdistuvan rikoksen suorittamiseen, joten sen hallussapito yleisellä paikalla ei ollut rangaistava teko.
Lainvoimainen