Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Kouvolan HO 26.02.1985 2179/84 AI generated

Holding that a hammer is not a weapon under the Weapons Act if intended for work or approved use.

Case Number Kouvolan HO 26.02.1985 2179/84
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the prosecution's charge against the defendant for possessing a hammer in public. The prosecution argued the hammer was a weapon suitable for assault, but the court found it was intended for work or approved use. Consequently, possession did not constitute a criminal offense under the Weapons Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

4 § of the Weapons Act; Possession of an object intended for work or approved use is not a criminal offense even if it could theoretically be used for assault.

Keywords

AI generated
Weapons Act possession offense intended use work tool criminal liability public place assault weapon

Cited Legislation

AI generated
4 § of the Weapons Act
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kuulapäistä vasaraa ei pidetty teräaselain 4 §:ssä tarkoitettuna teräaseena, joka on tarkoitettu työvälineeksi tai muuhun hyväksyttävään käyttöön mutta joka soveltuu henkeen tai terveyteen kohdistuvan rikoksen suorittamiseen, joten sen hallussapito yleisellä paikalla ei ollut rangaistava teko.

Lainvoimainen