Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Helsingin HO 11.09.1985 785 AI generated

Court dismisses claimant's right to participate in damages trial after bankruptcy estate decides against proceeding.

Case Number Helsingin HO 11.09.1985 785
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the claimant's right to participate in the damages trial following a bankruptcy estate decision. The estate's creditors' meeting resolved that the damages case did not warrant further action, leading to a decision not to pursue the claimant's initiated proceedings. Consequently, the court ruled that the claimant lost the standing to continue as a party in the trial.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

s. 24 of the Bankruptcy Act 1985; s. 10 of the Civil Procedure Code: The bankruptcy estate's decision not to pursue a claim terminates the claimant's right to participate in related civil proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
bankruptcy estate creditors meeting damages trial party standing procedural termination

Cited Legislation

AI generated
s. 24 of the Bankruptcy Act 1985
s. 10 of the Civil Procedure Code

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KKO:1925-I-21
AI generated
kko-precedent_1998_158
Supreme Court dismisses administrator's appeal as court decision did not directly bind him personally.
kko-other_2021_748
Supreme Court allows bankruptcy petition when court fails to schedule hearing for company representative.
kko-precedent_2005_9
Supreme Court dismisses lawyer liability for litigation costs when client's appeal lacks merit but evidence supports it.
kko-precedent_2000_20
Supreme Court holds a bankruptcy administrator liable for damages to a creditor when failing to disclose pending litigation in a creditors' meeting.
kko-precedent_1996_37
Supreme Court allows appeal against interim trustee appointment in bankruptcy proceedings as a final decision on continuation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A:n ajaman vahingonkorvausoikeudenkäynnin ollessa vireillä A:n omaisuus oli määrätty luovutettavaksi konkurssiin. Vahingonkorvausoikeudenkäynnissä RO:lle oli annettu näköisjäljennös A:n konkurssipesän velkojainkokouksen pöytäkirjasta, jonka mukaan kokous oli päättänyt ettei vahingonkorvausasia tuossa vaiheessa antanut aihetta toimenpiteisiin konkurssipesän taholta.

Konkurssipesä oli siten päättänyt olla ajamatta A:n alkamaa oikeudenkäyntiä ja A:lla oli siten ollut oikeus edelleen olla siinä asianosaisena.

KKO:1925-I-21

Tarjanne: Asianosaisseuraanto s. 131-132

Läsnä: Liukko, Piira ja Vihuri (apuj.) Esittelijä: Stenberg

Lainvoimainen