Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Helsingin HO 26.06.1985 547 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal when applicant withdraws housing request after alleging fraudulent inducement to sign power of attorney.

Case Number Helsingin HO 26.06.1985 547
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court of appeal dismissed the appeal against the lower court's decision to revoke the joint housing application. The applicant, A, claimed they were fraudulently induced to sign a power of attorney for the housing proceedings and subsequently withdrew the application. Consequently, the lower court's decision was revoked and removed from the register, ending the proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Kihlakunnanoikeuden 10 § ja 11 §:n nojalla: Kun hakija peruuttaa asumuserohakemuksensa, lausunnon antaminen raukesi ja kihlakunnanoikeuden päätös kumottiin ja poistettiin.

Keywords

AI generated
housing application withdrawal fraudulent inducement claim power of attorney validity lower court decision revocation procedural termination

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Kihlakunnanoikeuden 10 §
Kihlakunnanoikeuden 11 §
AI generated
appeal_1979_kouvola__867
Appeal court allows appointment of estate manager when one spouse's appeal blocks partition execution.
kko-precedent_1988_27
Supreme Court allows cohabitation partner monetary compensation for significant construction work when relationship breaks down.
kko-precedent_2014_77
Supreme Court dismisses appeal filed by a qualified lawyer without counsel due to procedural rule violation.
kko-precedent_2010_83
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when defendant files counter-appeal instead of appeal after extension. Defendant filed a counter-appeal instead of an appeal, and the Supreme Court held that because the counter-appeal was the only valid option available to the defendant, the prosecutor and victim could not file a counter-appeal against it.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2019:164
Permanent residence permit appeal jurisdiction determined by residence location, not asylum status, under new 193 § of Aliens Act.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kihlakunnanoikeuden tuomittua puolisot A:n ja B:n heidän yhteisestä hakemuksestaan asumuseroon A oli ilmoitettuaan tyytymättömyyttä kihlakunnanoikeuden päätökseen muutoksenhakemuksessaan kertonut, että hänet oli petollisella menettelyllä suostuteltu antamaan valtakirja yhteisestä hakemuksesta tapahtuvaa asumuseromenettelyä varten, ja sen vuoksi peruuttaen hakemuksensa vaatinut asian palauttamista tai ainakin kihlakunnanoikeuden päätöksen kumoamista. Koska A oli peruuttanut asumuserohakemuksensa, lausunnon antaminen hakemuksesta raukesi ja kihlakunnanoikeuden päätös kumottiin ja poistettiin.

Läsnä: Surakka, Haltia ja Nikula Esittelijä: Koskimies

Lainvoimainen