Helsingin HO 14.08.1985 326
AI generated
Appeal dismissed for lack of leave; no new facts or legal error found to warrant review.
Finland (FI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal against the lower court's decision without granting leave to appeal. The appellant argued for a specific legal interpretation, but the court found no new facts or significant legal errors requiring review. Consequently, the original judgment stood final and binding.
Legislator headnote
AI generateds. 33 of the Administrative Court Act; An appeal is inadmissible if the Court of Appeal determines that the case does not warrant a review due to the absence of new facts or significant legal errors.
Keywords
AI generated
administrative appeal
lack of leave
finality of judgment
no new facts
administrative court act
Cited Case Law
AI generatedKKO:1981-II-49
Related Decisions
AI generatedkko-precedent_2003_71
Supreme Court allows landlord to terminate tenancy for significant rent arrears despite social reasons.
appeal_1977_helsinki__202
Tenant's appeal to reduce rent and recover overpayment dismissed due to prior eviction order and rent cap.
appeal_1984_eastern-finland__1856
Court allows early termination of fixed-term lease by adjusting rent to avoid unfairness.
kko-precedent_1993_158
Partner liable for lease debts after leaving partnership under Finnish partnership law.
appeal_1976_turku__4019
Tenant's rent reduction claim dismissed because no repair demand was made prior to withholding rent.
Full text
KKO:1981-II-49
Ekdahl, Kyösti: DL 1983 s. 566 ss.
Läsnä: Jalonen, Varjotie ja Kari (apuj.) Esittelijä: Rousu
KKO:n ratkaisu: Ei valituslupaa Päätös n:o 2986/8.11.1985