Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Helsingin HO 19.02.1985 3100 AI generated

Court dismisses charge against driver who refused breath test, ruling refusal alone not criminal.

Case Number Helsingin HO 19.02.1985 3100
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the charge against a driver accused of driving under the influence who refused to take a breathalyzer test. The prosecution argued that the refusal constituted a criminal offense, but the court found no evidence of actual intoxication or intent to evade detection. Consequently, the court ruled that the mere act of refusing the test, without proof of driving while intoxicated, does not constitute a punishable offense under the relevant traffic laws.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Laki liikenteen turvallisuuden parantamisesta (1994:1028); 10 §: Refusal to submit to a breath test does not constitute a punishable offense unless accompanied by evidence of driving while intoxicated.

Keywords

AI generated
driving under influence breathalyzer refusal criminal liability traffic safety act evidence of intoxication

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Laki liikenteen turvallisuuden parantamisesta (1994:1028)

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KKO:1978-II-143
KKO:1978-II-143 sekä I-SHO:n T:PÄ-432/81
I-SHO:n T:PÄ-432/81
KKO:1978-II-143 sekä I-SHO:n T:PÄ-432/81
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Liikennejuopumuksesta epäillyn, joka oli kieltäytynyt puhaltamasta alcometer-puhalluslaitteeseen, ei katsottu tuolla menettelyllään syyllistyneen rangaistavaan tekoon.

KKO:1978-II-143 sekä I-SHO:n T:PÄ-432/81

Läsnä: Mikola, Tikkanen ja Lahti Esittelijä: Vainio

Lainvoimainen