Court dismisses charge against driver who refused breath test, ruling refusal alone not criminal.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the charge against a driver accused of driving under the influence who refused to take a breathalyzer test. The prosecution argued that the refusal constituted a criminal offense, but the court found no evidence of actual intoxication or intent to evade detection. Consequently, the court ruled that the mere act of refusing the test, without proof of driving while intoxicated, does not constitute a punishable offense under the relevant traffic laws.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedLaki liikenteen turvallisuuden parantamisesta (1994:1028); 10 §: Refusal to submit to a breath test does not constitute a punishable offense unless accompanied by evidence of driving while intoxicated.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Liikennejuopumuksesta epäillyn, joka oli kieltäytynyt puhaltamasta alcometer-puhalluslaitteeseen, ei katsottu tuolla menettelyllään syyllistyneen rangaistavaan tekoon.
KKO:1978-II-143 sekä I-SHO:n T:PÄ-432/81
Läsnä: Mikola, Tikkanen ja Lahti Esittelijä: Vainio
Lainvoimainen