Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Helsingin HO 23.10.1985 145 AI generated

Court dismissed cohabitation partner's eviction request as HVL 12 applies only to married spouses.

Case Number Helsingin HO 23.10.1985 145
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the plaintiff's request for the defendant to vacate a shared residence under HVL 12. Although the parties lived together as a family without marriage, the court ruled that the specific statute governing eviction applies exclusively to married spouses. Consequently, the legal provision could not be extended to unmarried cohabiting partners in this instance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

HVL 12 §; The provision mandating a spouse to leave the marital home applies strictly to married couples and cannot be applied to unmarried cohabiting partners.

Keywords

AI generated
unmarried cohabitation eviction rights HVL 12 marital home spousal obligation civil cohabitation residential dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
HVL 12 §
Välien rikkouduttua vaati A, että B HVL 12 §:n säännöstä soveltaen velvoitetaan muuttamaan huoneistosta.
AI generated
kko-precedent_2008_66
Supreme Court dismisses claim for rent reimbursement based on marital support duty rather than general debt recourse rights.
appeal_1978_helsinki__175
Court rejects tenant's claim that partial eviction of a kitchen and hall constitutes a valid termination of the main lease.
appeal_1975_helsinki__340
Court of Appeal dismissed appeal because Housing Authority lacked jurisdiction over tenancy dispute.
insurance_1999_9113-1998
Student living in parents' building but not their home denied study aid due to residence rules.
appeal_1974_helsinki__12
Tenant eviction for family housing needs upheld; landlord failed to prove necessity of larger unit.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A ja B olivat yhteisesti vuokranneet asuinhuoneiston, jossa he olivat kahden yhteisen lapsensa kanssa eläneet avioliittoa solmimatta jatkuvasti avioliitonomaisissa olosuhteissa yhteisessä taloudessa. Välien rikkouduttua vaati A, että B HVL 12 §:n säännöstä soveltaen velvoitetaan muuttamaan huoneistosta.

Kanne hylättiin, koska mainittu säännös koski aviopuolisoja eikä sitä katsottu voitavan soveltaa ns. avopuolisoihin.

Läsnä: Poukka, Jalonen, Kari (apuj.), Pohjola ja Kaarni

(asiant.) Esittelijä: Paasikoski

Lainvoimainen