Itä-Suomen HO 24.05.1985 36/85 AI generated

Opposing party in inheritance dispute ordered to pay applicant's court costs.

Case Number Itä-Suomen HO 24.05.1985 36/85

Court / Authority Hovioikeus

Jurisdiction

Finland (FI)

Decision Date 24.05.1985

Outcome Allowed / Granted

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court ruled that the opposing party in an inheritance dispute must reimburse the applicant's litigation expenses. The applicant sought costs against the party contesting the division of the estate, which was granted based on established case law. This decision reinforces the principle that the losing party in such proceedings bears the financial burden of the legal process.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Lainvoimainen: In a case concerning the appointment of an heir, the opposing party is obligated to reimburse the applicant's court costs.

Keywords

AI generated

inheritance dispute court costs litigation expenses opposing party financial liability

Cited Case Law

AI generated

I-SHO T:PÄ-1332/69

I-SHO T:PÄ-16/70

I-SHO T:PÄ-486/72

I-SHO T:PÄ-986/74

I-SHO T:PÄ-1000/75

I-SHO T:PÄ-1050/76

I-SHO T:PÄ-1218/81

KouHO T:PÄ-223/78

KouHO T:PÄ-1602/81

AI generated

appeal_1981_kouvola__1602

Court orders costs for appointing a partition agent to be paid from estate assets under inheritance law.

kko-precedent_1995_177

Supreme Court holds that majority estate owner's nominee is not decisive if the nominated executor is suitable.

kko-precedent_1991_82

Supreme Court allows estate costs for necessary partition agent appointment to be paid from estate assets.

kko-precedent_1995_175

Supreme Court dismisses appeal; prior executor status does not disqualify lawyer as estate administrator.

kko-precedent_1989_142

Supreme Court allows partition request against estate agreement claim due to lack of evidence.

Full text

Pesänjakajan määräämistä koskevassa hakemusasiassa voitiin hakemusta vastustanut asianosainen velvoittaa korvaamaan hakijan oikeudenkäyntikulut.

Ks. esim. I-SHO:n T:PÄ-1332/69, T:PÄ-16/70, T:PÄ-

486/72, T:PÄ-986/74, T:PÄ-1000/75, T:PÄ-1050/76 ja T:PÄ-1218/81.

Vrt. KouHO:n T:PÄ-223/78 ja T:PÄ-1602/81.

Aalto: Maksuton oikeudenkäynti, 1974, s. 275-276

Lainvoimainen