Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Helsingin HO 03.07.1984 981 AI generated

Gunpowder aerosol containing tear gas is not a weapon under the Criminal Code for minor assault charges.

Case Number Helsingin HO 03.07.1984 981
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the prosecution's charge of minor assault based on the use of a gas aerosol containing tear gas. The defendant argued that the device did not constitute a weapon under the relevant section of the Criminal Code. Consequently, the court ruled that the specific statutory definition of a weapon was not met, leading to the dismissal of the case.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Criminal Code s. 21.14; A gas aerosol containing tear gas as an active substance is not considered a weapon under s. 21.14 of the Criminal Code for the purpose of charging minor assault.

Keywords

AI generated
Criminal Code weapon definition tear gas aerosol minor assault charge prosecution dismissal active substance legal classification

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Criminal Code s. 21.14
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

FN-merkkistä kaasusumutinta, joka sisälsi vaikuttavana aineena kyynelkaasua nesteeseen liuotettuna, ei ollut pidettävä rikoslain 21 luvun 14 §:n 1 momentissa tarkoitettuna aseena. Sen vuoksi virallisen syyttäjän ajama syyte yksityisellä paikalla tuollaista kaasusumutinta käyttäen tapahtuneesta lievästä pahoinpitelystä, jota asianomistaja ei ollut ilmoittanut syytteeseen pantavaksi, on jätetty tutkimatta.

Läsnä: Järvinen, Varjotie ja Vihuri (apuj.) Esittelijä: Hattari

Lainvoimainen