Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Helsingin HO 28.12.1984 891 AI generated

Court dismissed buyer's request for court consent to property sale under AL 40 § due to lack of legal standing.

Case Number Helsingin HO 28.12.1984 891
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the buyer's application for judicial consent to the property sale under section 40 of the Act on the Administration of Real Estate. The buyer argued for the consent, but the court found they lacked the necessary legal standing to invoke this specific provision. Consequently, the request was rejected as the statutory requirements for the buyer's involvement were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

AL 40 §; The buyer of real estate does not have the right to request court consent for the sale of the property under section 40 of the Act on the Administration of Real Estate.

Keywords

AI generated
Act on Administration of Real Estate judicial consent requirement property sale procedure buyer legal standing court decision dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AL 40 §
Kiinteistön ostajalla ei ollut oikeutta AL 40 §:n nojalla hakea tuomioistuimen suostumusta kiinteistönkaupalle.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KKO 9.1.1961 n:o 347/178 VD 1960
Vrt KKO 9.1.1961 n:o 347/178 VD 1960
AI generated
appeal_1981_eastern-finland__278
Court dismisses claim for invalidating a property sale due to lack of authority to consent.
kko-precedent_1988_106
Supreme Court holds that a public notary's lack of jurisdiction does not invalidate a land sale contract.
kko-precedent_2001_57
Supreme Court held that a shareholder approval clause applies to existing shareholders acquiring additional shares unless approved on reasonable grounds.
kko-precedent_1990_170
Supreme Court allows mortgage priority improvement without owner consent when owner fails to prove harm.
kko-precedent_1992_56
Matrimonial property sale dismissed because post-divorce settlement cured lack of spouse consent.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kiinteistön ostajalla ei ollut oikeutta AL 40 §:n nojalla hakea tuomioistuimen suostumusta kiinteistönkaupalle.

Rautiala: Avioliitto-oikeus 1968 s 317 Caselius: LM

1945 s 285 Aarnio: Aviovarallisuusjärjestelmät s 74

Vrt KKO 9.1.1961 n:o 347/178 VD 1960

Läsnä: Valkonen, C. Kuhlefelt ja Varjotie Esittelijä: Ilveskoski

KKO:n ratkaisu: Ei valituslupaa Päätös n:o 749/26.3.1985