Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Helsingin HO 17.10.1984 819 AI generated

Bankruptcy estate's temporary custodians lacked standing to sue for debts after the bankruptcy proceedings were suspended.

Case Number Helsingin HO 17.10.1984 819
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court of appeal dismissed the lawsuit filed by temporary custodians of a bankruptcy estate seeking payment for a debt incurred after the estate sold assets. The lower court held that these custodians lacked standing to initiate proceedings for the recovery of claims once the bankruptcy proceedings had been suspended under the relevant bankruptcy regulations. The appellate court upheld this decision, confirming that the temporary custodians could not pursue such claims outside the suspended bankruptcy framework.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Konkurssisäännön 15 § 3 momentti; The temporary custodians of a bankruptcy estate lack standing to sue for claims arising after the suspension of bankruptcy proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
bankruptcy proceedings suspension of proceedings standing to sue temporary custodians recovery of claims bankruptcy estate procedural standing

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Konkurssisäännön 15 § 3 momentti
AI generated
appeal_1967_vaasa__x262
Creditor's appeal to bankruptcy estate by sole manager deemed inadmissible, case dismissed for lack of legal standing.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2021:43
Supreme Court rules that a bankrupt estate must pay litigation costs when withdrawing a claim without special circumstances.
kko-precedent_1989_113
Supreme Court allows guarantors to offset post-judgment debt payments against bankruptcy estate claims under Section 33 of Bankruptcy Act.
kko-other_2001_1314
Supreme Court allows insurer to recover policy value in insolvency despite non-refundability commitment.
kko-precedent_1993_36
Shareholder's loan claim dismissed because capital maintenance rules require valid security for shareholder loans.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Yhtiö oli asetettu konkurssiin 27.10.1983. Konkurssi oli konkurssisäännön 15 §:n 3 momentin nojalla rauennut 29.12.1983.

Konkurssipesän väliaikaisiksi pesänhoitajiksi määrätyt asianajajat olivat 14.3.1984 tiedoksi toimituttamansa haasteen nojalla vaatineet konkurssipesälle suoritusta saatavasta, joka oli syntynyt konkurssipesän myytyä yhtiön tavaravaraston ja muuta irtainta omaisuutta 11.11.1983.

Kihlakunnanoikeus katsoi, ettei konkurssipesän väliaikaisiksi pesänhoitajiksi määrätyillä kantajilla ollut kannevaltaa saamisten perimisessä konkurssimenettelyn rauettua, ja jätti kanteen tutkimatta.

Hovioikeus ei muuttanut kihlakunnanoikeuden päätöstä.

Läsnä: Kurvinen, Hirvonen ja Lähdevuori (apuj.) Esittelijä: Lehtimäki

KKO:n ratkaisu: Ei valituslupaa Päätös n:o 74/24.1.1985