Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Helsingin HO 22.05.1984 733 AI generated

Court dismissed father's criminal charge for unauthorized car use where he did not report the offense to prosecutors.

Case Number Helsingin HO 22.05.1984 733
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the formal prosecution's charge against a father convicted for unauthorized use of a vehicle. The father had utilized the car without permission but failed to report the offense to the authorities as required. The court applied specific sections of the Criminal Code to vacate the penalty imposed by the lower court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Rikoslain 38 luvun 6 a §; 9 §:n 2 momentti: When a person commits an offense but fails to report it to the prosecutor, the court may apply these provisions to dismiss the prosecution's charge against them.

Keywords

AI generated
unauthorized vehicle use failure to report offense dismissal of prosecution Criminal Code provisions criminal liability waiver

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Criminal Code Chapter 38 Section 6a
Criminal Code Section 9 Paragraph 2
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Luvattomasti käyttöön otetun auton omisti tuomitun isä, joka ei ollut ilmoittanut rikosta syytteeseen pantavaksi. Hovioikeus soveltaen rikoslain 38 luvun 6 a §:ää ja 9 §:n 2 momenttia poisti kihlakunnanoikeuden virallisen syyttäjän syytteestä tuomitseman rangaistuksen.

Läsnä: Tarma, Lakovaara, Lahti (apuj.) Esittelijä: Mikkola

Lainvoimainen