Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Helsingin HO 22.08.1984 301 AI generated

Court allowed recovery of bank transfers made to a third party for a bankrupt company's debts.

Case Number Helsingin HO 22.08.1984 301
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court granted the claim for the return of funds transferred from a bankrupt company's bank account to a third party. The plaintiff argued that the transfers were made to satisfy the bankrupt company's debts, while the defendant contested the right to recover the money. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff because the transfers were intended for the benefit of the bankrupt entity, making them recoverable under bankruptcy law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 10 of the Bankruptcy Act; Section 10 of the Bankruptcy Act: Transfers made from a bankrupt's account to a third party for the purpose of satisfying the bankrupt's debts are subject to recovery by the bankruptcy estate.

Keywords

AI generated
bankruptcy recovery third party payment bank account transfer debt satisfaction bankruptcy estate

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 10 of the Bankruptcy Act
AI generated
appeal_1981_kouvola__698
Holder's subsequent acquisition of a bill does not revive the drawer's liability after the acceptor's payment.
kko-precedent_2003_112
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; dual recovery orders for same debt do not justify setting aside prior judgment.
kko-precedent_1998_24
Bank payment to guarantor before bankruptcy discharge deemed premature and recoverable under insolvency law.
kko-precedent_1989_17
Bank transfer deemed not received by debtor before bankruptcy filing, debt remains with bankruptcy estate.
kko-precedent_1993_132
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where erroneous bank transfer to insolvent debtor cannot be recovered due to commingling.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kommandiittiyhtiö A:n pankkitililtä oli kuuden kuukauden kuluessa ennen A:n konkurssin alkua suoritettu neljällä eri pankkisiirrolla pankille B 5.050,90 markkaa kommandiittiyhtiö C:n velkojen maksamiseksi ja 8.211,40 markkaa vekselin maksamiseksi, joka suoritus oli tullut kommandiittiyhtyö C:n hyväksi. Konkurssipesän B:hen kohdistama ko. määrän palauttamista tarkoittava takaisinsaantikanne hyväksyttiin.

Ään.

Pertti Tauvo: Takaisinsaanneista. Käytännön konkurssioikeutta,

lakimiesliiton koulutuskeskuksen julkaisusarja

n:o 8 s.68.

Konkurssioikeuden kehittämiskomitean mietintö 1978:37 s. 526 ss

vrt. Turun HO:n päätös 19.11.1982 n:o 781 (Dnro 1982 S

4)

Läsnä: Tarma (erim.), Haltia ja Lahti (apuj.) Esittelijä: Levo

Lainvoimainen