Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Helsingin HO 28.11.1984 294 AI generated

Tenant's right to transfer lease to child upheld; landlord's objection rejected due to family context.

Case Number Helsingin HO 28.11.1984 294
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the landlord's lawsuit to terminate the lease, ruling that the transfer of tenancy rights to the child was valid. The landlord argued the building was subsidized and required specific tenant selection, but the court found no evidence preventing the transfer between parent and child. Consequently, the transfer was deemed lawful, and the landlord's claim for termination was rejected.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Subsidized housing act; Family law: A tenant's right to transfer a lease to a child is valid unless the landlord can demonstrate unreasonable objection based on specific housing regulations or selection criteria.

Keywords

AI generated
subsidized housing lease transfer parental rights tenant selection termination of lease family tenancy landlord objection

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Subsidized Housing Act
AI generated
kko-precedent_1992_14
Supreme Court allows landlord to terminate tenancy for maintenance work use under Housing Lease Act s. 53.3.
kko-precedent_1990_80
Land lease right cannot be transferred in shares without landlord consent; partial transfers invalid under Finnish Land Lease Act.
appeal_1976_helsinki__53
Tenant's claim for lease termination due to employer's need for housing was dismissed as evidence was insufficient.
appeal_1975_helsinki__117
Court allows eviction claim against mother when son's verbal lease right is transferred without landlord consent.
appeal_1976_helsinki__100
Court of Appeal remands case to Administrative Court to determine if military housing dispute is a tenancy or administrative matter.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

A oli vuokrattuaan kiinteistöyhtiöltä asuinhuoneiston siirtänyt vuokrasopimuksen lapselleen. Yhtiö oli katsonut, ettei se kohtuudella voinut tyytyä vuokraoikeuden siirtoon, koska kysymyksessä oli asuntolainoitettu vuokratalo, johon taloyhtiön pääosakas oli itse saanut valita työsuhteen perusteella otettavat vuokralaiset. Valinta oli lisäksi kaupungin viranomaisten hyväksyttävä. Kiinteistöyhtiön irtisanomista tarkoittava kanne hylättiin, koska vuokraoikeuden siirto oli tapahtunut vanhemman ja lasten kesken eikä ollut osoitettu, etteikö vuokranantaja kohtuudella voinut tyytyä uusiin vuokralaisiin. (Ään.)

Läsnä:Poukka, Vallinrinne (erim.), M. Kuhlefelt (apuj.), Pohjola (asiant.) ja Kaarni (erim., asiant.). Esittelijä: Valtonen

Lainvoimainen