Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Helsingin HO 06.06.1984 29 AI generated

Housing maintenance contract dispute dismissed because tenancy issues fall under housing law, not general contract law.

Case Number Helsingin HO 06.06.1984 29
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for a housing maintenance contract, ruling it was not a tenancy dispute. The plaintiff argued the contract's validity, but the court found the matter concerned housing tenancy issues under the Housing Tenancy Act. Consequently, the case was not examined as a general contract dispute.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 1 of the Act on Housing Tenancy Cases; The court must determine jurisdiction based on the nature of the dispute, dismissing claims for housing maintenance contracts that are substantively tenancy-related cases.

Keywords

AI generated
housing maintenance contract tenancy dispute jurisdiction Housing Tenancy Act contract validity claim court of appeal decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Act on Housing Tenancy Cases, Section 1
AI generated
kko-precedent_1992_14
Supreme Court allows landlord to terminate tenancy for maintenance work use under Housing Lease Act s. 53.3.
appeal_1976_helsinki__93
Landlord's appeal dismissed; tenant failed to prove landlord needed unit for employee housing.
appeal_1977_helsinki__1066
Tenant eviction based on employment contract termination is invalid if no actual employment relationship existed.
appeal_1975_helsinki__209
Tenant's eviction claim dismissed because lease continued after employment ended due to lack of evidence.
appeal_1974_helsinki__105
Court dismissed tenant eviction claim because landlord failed to prove specific building portion needed for their own residence.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asunto-osakeyhtiö ja huoltoyhtiö olivat tehneet kiinteistönhuoltosopimuksen, johon liittyi työsuhdeasuntona yksiö, jota koskeva vuokrasuhde huoltosopimuksen mukaan päättyy aikaisintaan huoltosopimuksen voimassaolon päättyessä. Kun huoltosopimuksen irtisanomisen jälkeen asunto-oikeudessa nostettu kanne perustui kiinteistönhuoltosopimuksen voimassaolon toteamiseen eikä ollut sellainen huoneenvuokrasuhteesta johtuvariita-asia, joka oikeudenkäynnistä huoneenvuokra-asioissa annetun lain 1 §:n mukaan tulisi käsitellä asunto-oikeudessa, jätettiin kanne tutkittavaksi ottamatta.

Läsnä: Poukka, Vallinrinne, M. Kuhlefelt (apuj.),

Pohjola (asiant.) ja Kaarni (asiant.) Esittelijä: Tuominen

Lainvoimainen