Appeal dismissed; union representative lacks standing to represent employer in collective bargaining duty breach case.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the appeal regarding a dispute over the employer's failure to fulfill collective bargaining obligations. The appellant argued that the union's head of trust, acting as the employer's representative, had the authority to represent the employer in this specific matter. The court rejected this claim, holding that the head of trust does not possess the legal standing to represent the employer in proceedings concerning breaches of collective bargaining duties.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedSection 1 of the Collective Bargaining Act; Section 10 of the Trade Union Act: The head of trust of a trade union does not have the right to represent the employer in proceedings concerning the employer's failure to fulfill collective bargaining obligations.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Pääluottamusmiehellä on katsottu olevan henkilöstön edustajana asianomistajan puhevalta yhteistoimintavelvoitteen rikkomista koskevassa asiassa.
Suviranta: Oikeudenkäynneistä yhteistoimintalakia koskevissa asioissa; Työoikeudellisen yhdistyksen vuosikirja 1980, s. 5- 16.
Vrt. Hel Ho T: 1848/84, Hel Ho T: 1880/84, Kou Ho T: 267/83, Kou Ho T: 266/83
Läsnä: Seppälä, Piira ja Karppinen (apuj.) Esittelijä: Virolainen
KKO:n ratkaisu: Ei valituslupaa Päätös n:o 394/28.2.1985