Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Helsingin HO 06.11.1984 2103 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; union representative lacks standing to represent employer in collective bargaining duty breach case.

Case Number Helsingin HO 06.11.1984 2103
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the appeal regarding a dispute over the employer's failure to fulfill collective bargaining obligations. The appellant argued that the union's head of trust, acting as the employer's representative, had the authority to represent the employer in this specific matter. The court rejected this claim, holding that the head of trust does not possess the legal standing to represent the employer in proceedings concerning breaches of collective bargaining duties.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 1 of the Collective Bargaining Act; Section 10 of the Trade Union Act: The head of trust of a trade union does not have the right to represent the employer in proceedings concerning the employer's failure to fulfill collective bargaining obligations.

Keywords

AI generated
collective bargaining obligations employer representation trade union head of trust procedural standing appeal dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 1 of the Collective Bargaining Act
Section 10 of the Trade Union Act

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KKO 394/28.2.1985
Hel Ho T 1848/84
Hel Ho T 1880/84
Kou Ho T 267/83
Kou Ho T 266/83
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pääluottamusmiehellä on katsottu olevan henkilöstön edustajana asianomistajan puhevalta yhteistoimintavelvoitteen rikkomista koskevassa asiassa.

Suviranta: Oikeudenkäynneistä yhteistoimintalakia koskevissa asioissa; Työoikeudellisen yhdistyksen vuosikirja 1980, s. 5- 16.

Vrt. Hel Ho T: 1848/84, Hel Ho T: 1880/84, Kou Ho T: 267/83, Kou Ho T: 266/83

Läsnä: Seppälä, Piira ja Karppinen (apuj.) Esittelijä: Virolainen

KKO:n ratkaisu: Ei valituslupaa Päätös n:o 394/28.2.1985