Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vaasan HO 10.06.1983 970/83 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal against conviction for poisoning by selling adulterated wine as state wine.

Case Number Vaasan HO 10.06.1983 970/83
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the appeal against the conviction of three individuals who sold adulterated wine as state wine, causing injury to the buyers. The defendants argued for leniency, but the court upheld the conviction under the specific provision regarding poisoning. The decision confirms that selling known toxic substances as safe state wine constitutes the crime of poisoning.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Rikoslain 34 luvun 15 §:n 1 momentti; The court established that selling a substance known to be poisonous as safe state wine constitutes the crime of poisoning, regardless of the seller's intent to harm.

Keywords

AI generated
poisoning crime state wine fraud adulterated substance criminal liability injury causation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Rikoslain 34 luvun 15 §:n 1 momentti
AI generated
kko-precedent_1997_117
Supreme Court merges multiple drug possession and aiding offenses into single crimes for sentencing reduction.
kko-precedent_2001_43
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when indictment fails to charge co-perpetrator with joint crime causing death.
kko-precedent_1999_36
Supreme Court dismisses theft charge as prior fraud charge was final and covered same act.
kko-precedent_1992_91
Supreme Court dismisses contract rescission claims but allows separate damage claims after final default judgment.
appeal_1971_vaasa__284
Hunting a reindeer on a pasture is not hunting; shooting a domestic reindeer is not a crime.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kolme vastaajaa oli myynyt A:lle pullon AIV-liuosta valtion viinana ja salaten aineen myrkyllisyyden. A sekä hänen toverinsa B ja C nauttivat liuosta ja vammautuivat. Vastaajat tuomittiin kukin rangaistukseen, paitsi muusta, rikoslain 34 luvun 15 §:n 1 momentin nojalla vain yhdestä myrkyttämisestä.

Lainvoimainen