Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Helsingin HO 02.06.1983 543 AI generated

Court dismisses prosecution for continued failure to report military service status until obligation fulfilled.

Case Number Helsingin HO 02.06.1983 543
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the prosecution against the defendant for failing to report his military service status as required by law. The prosecution argued that the defendant continued to neglect his reporting duty until the obligation was finally met. The court ruled that the statute of limitations for criminal proceedings only began running once the defendant fulfilled his reporting obligation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Asevelvollisuuslain soveltamisesta annetun asetuksen 75 § 1 momentin 3 kohta; The statute of limitations for criminal prosecution regarding the violation of military service reporting obligations commences only upon the fulfillment of such obligation.

Keywords

AI generated
military service reporting statute of limitations criminal prosecution dismissal obligation fulfillment procedural time limits

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Asevelvollisuuslain soveltamisesta annetun asetuksen 75 § 1 momentin 3 kohta

Cited Case Law

AI generated
TurHO 30.5.1952 (plenumratkaisu), 1950 R.D., Fol. 650 n:o 6
KKO:1950-II-184a
DL 1934, oik.tap. s. 109
KouHO P:1165/79
KouHO P:1165/79, KKO:1939-II-445, KKO:1949-I-17
KKO:1939-II-445
KouHO P:1165/79, KKO:1939-II-445, KKO:1949-I-17
KKO:1949-I-17
KouHO P:1165/79, KKO:1939-II-445, KKO:1949-I-17
AI generated
kko-precedent_2007_83
Supreme Court rejects extension of prosecution time limit for crime committed before new law's enactment.
kko-precedent_1988_124
Supreme Court allows appeal against dismissal of private prosecution due to prosecutor's decision not to prosecute.
kko-precedent_2013_40
Supreme Court dismisses extension of prosecution time limit as defendant was reachable but avoided service.
appeal_1982_eastern-finland__352
Tax fraud statute of limitations begins when tax list is published, not when false declaration is submitted.
appeal_1985_helsinki__188
Police report filed by private complainant counts as formal prosecutor's indictment under RL 8.6.1, preventing statute of limitations expiry.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asevelvollisten valvontaa koskevien määräysten rikkominen.

Asevelvollisuuslain soveltamisesta annetun asetuksen 75 § 1 momentin 3 kohdan mukaisen ilmoitusvelvollisuuden laiminlyönti jatkui, kunnes ilmoitusvelvollisuus oli täytetty. Syyteoikeuden vanhentuminen alkoi vasta ilmoitusvelvollisuuden täyttämisestä.

Honkasalo: Suomen rikosoikeus, Yleiset opit III (1969) s. 273

TurHO 30.5.1952 (plenumratkaisu), 1950 R.D.,

Fol. 650 n:o 6

KKO:1950-II-184a

DL 1934, oik.tap. s. 109

Vrt. KouHO P:1165/79, KKO:1939-II-445, KKO:1949-I-17

Läsnä: M. Luova, Kurvinen ja Hirvonen Esittelijä: Kivalo

Lainvoimainen